Title VII (Employment Discrimination)

2017 Annual Notices

This chart describes some of the notices required by federal law, including the method required to give notice where it is specified in the statutes and/or regulations, and provides links to documents that may be used in writing such notices. 

NSBA and IMLA Urge High Court to Hear Employment Case, Citing Operational Realities of School Boards

Alexandria, Va. (February 10, 2016) — The National School Boards Association (NSBA) joined the International Municipal Lawyers Association in filing a “friend of the court” (amicus) brief Monday in the U.S. Supreme Court, supporting the employer’s request for review in the case of City of Houston v. Zamora...."Such a rule levies an unfair and onerous burden on boards as employers given that no amount of internal process would protect them from liability if a jury later finds that the credited employee had a discriminatory motive,” said Thomas J. Gentzel, Executive Director, NSBA.

City of Houston v. Zamora (U.S. Sup. Ct. Petition Brief 2016)

Whether the Fifth Court erred in applying the "cat's paw" theory of liability to Title VII

EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores (U.S. Sup. Ct. - Merits Brief)

Employment Discrimination: Title VII – duty to provide religious accommodation in the absence of actual notice of need for accommodation

Torres v. Mantee County School District

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida opinion holding that Title VII preempts Title IX as to school employees' discrimination and retaliation claims unrelated to their students.

NSBA Amicus Brief - Gross v. FBL Financial Services (U.S. Sup. Ct.)

Age Discrimination in Employment Act:  burden of proof--mixed motive instruction.  Filed 3/4/09.

Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (U.S. Sup. Ct.) - Merits Brief

Employment:  Age Discrimination in Employment Act—burden of proof for reasonable factor other than age.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Title VII (Employment Discrimination)
Go to top