Legal Advocacy

U.S. Department of Commerce v. State of New York, No. 18-966 (U.S. Sup. Ct. - Merits Brief)

Equity & Discrimination: 1. Whether the district court erred in enjoining the Secretary of Commerce from reinstating a question about citizenship to the 2020 decennial census on the ground that the Secretary's decision violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq.

Kisor v. Wilkie (U.S. Sup. Ct. - Merits Brief)

Legal System: Whether Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), should be overruled

Brief filed January 31, 2019

Regents of University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (9th Cir.)

Equity & Discrimination: Amicus brief in support of motion for a preliminary injunction to bar United States government from terminating the DACA program.

South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc. (U.S. Sup. Ct. - Merits Brief)

Finance: Should the U.S. Supreme Court abrogate the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), sales-tax-only, physical-presence requirement.

Vidal v. Nielsen (E.D. N.Y.)

Equity & Discrimination: Amicus brief in support of motion for a preliminary injunction to bar the United States government from terminating the DACA program

L.H. v. Hamilton County Department of Education (6th Cir.)

Special Education & Disabilities: What are the appropriate standards for determining whether an educational placement offers the least restrictive environment (“LRE”) for a student with a disability and whether a change in location constitutes a change of placement?

R.M. v. Gilbert Unified School District (9th Cir.)

Special Education & Disabilities: Whether IDEA's FAPE requirement that a student's IEP must provide educational benefit as defined by Endrew F.  outweighs IDEA's preference for such benefit in the least restrictive environment.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Legal Advocacy
Go to top