Error message

The page you requested does not exist. For your convenience, a search was performed using the query MainMenu SchoolLaw Issues aspx.

Page not found

Search results

  1. Carcano v. McCrory

    issues an opinion in Gloucester County School Board v. G.G. At the Scheduling Conference, the Court heard ... issues raised by the USDOJ Plaintiff, including the need to keep discovery on track so that this case is ... ready for trial soon after a decision in G.G. has issued. However, the Court also considered the ...

  2. Evancho v. Pine-Richland Sch. Dist.

    with their biological sex or a unisex restroom. In recognition of the issue that a male presenting as ... separate facilities (i.e. locker rooms, showers, etc.) are not at issue in this matter. Case ... Title IX regulations issued by the United States Department of Education (“DOE”) allow schools to ...

  3. Evancho v. Pine-Richland Sch. Dist.

    District, as well as other school districts around the country, were continuing to struggle with the issue ... Board further recognized that the legal environment on the issue was unsettled and offered that it now ... [presents] issues which would likely induce [the] Court to grant certiorari.” See Russo v. Byrne, 409 U.S. ...

  4. Evancho v.Pine-Richland Sch. Dist.

    District, as well as other school districts around the country, were continuing to struggle with the issue ... Board further recognized that the legal environment on the issue was unsettled and offered that it now ... [presents] issues which would likely induce [the] Court to grant certiorari.” See Russo v. Byrne, 409 U.S. ...

  5. Evancho v. Pine-Richard Sch. Dist.

    Plaintiffs inappropriately rely upon guidance issued by the Unites States Department of Education (“DOE”) and ... was issued by the DOE and DOJ without appropriate notice and comment rule-making as required by the ...

  6. Evancho v. Pine-Richland Sch. Dist.

    issued by Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G., 136 S. Ct. 2442 (2016)…………………………..passim Glenn v. Brumby, 663 ... Juliet’s Decl. ¶¶ 54-55; M. Evancho Decl. ¶ 30. III. LEGAL STANDARD “The decision to issue a preliminary ... Apr. 19, 2016), mandate recalled and stay issued by Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G., 136 S. Ct. 2442 ...

  7. Board of Educ. Highland Local Sch. Dist. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.

    school year.” (Doc. 36 at 2.) Following extensive briefing and oral argument, the Court issued its ...

  8. NSBA Comments to U.S. Dept. of Education on Supplement not Supplant Proposed Rule

    determine all issues related to the proportional inclusion of employees assigned to multiple Title I and ... NSBA’s Beliefs and Policies best describes NSBA’s position on this important issue: “NSBA believes ...

  9. Board of Educ. Highland Local Sch. Dist. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.

    several years, DOE has issued several guidance documents explaining the agency’s interpretation of Title ... Colleague Letter, Doc. 33-1 at 8.) In April 2014, OCR issued a “significant guidance document” stating that ... Extracurricular Activities, Doc. 33-3 at 25.) In April 2015, OCR issued a Title IX Resource Guide, which stated ...

  10. Schwartz v. Lopez/Duncan v. State of Nevada

    belong to the parents and are not "public funds" subject to Article 11, Section 10. The issue ... relief). We now recognize an exception to this injury requirement in certain cases involving issues of ... available only if the following criteria are met. First, the case must involve an issue of significant ...

Pages

Go to top